David Headberry, representative for the Major Energy Users (MEU), has written an open letter to the Department of Industry commenting on Oakley Greenwood’s Demand Response Mechanism (DRM) cost benefit analysis. The Major Energy Users Inc. is made up of more than 20 large energy using companies across Australia. Regarding the DRM paper, Mr Headberry stated “it fails to recognise that the energy supply chain is not an end in itself, but a part of the overall supply chain in delivering outcomes and excludes the loss of efficiencies that result by the users of the energy supplying DR into the energy markets. By focusing purely on the energy supply chain, it excludes the overall national impacts on loss of efficiencies. This is a significant omission in the study.”
The original report compiled by Oakley Greenwood can be found here.
Neil Anderson, on behalf of Energex Limited, has penned this open letter to the Department of Industry. Mr Anderson stated “Energex continues to support efficient demand side participation as part of our approach to operating an efficient network, improving asset…
The Major Energy Users Inc. have published this open document, commenting on the SA Government’s ‘bidding in good faith’ rule change proposal. The rule change proposal looks to address the observed use by generators of rebidding as a tool for…
Dr Fiona Simon from ERM Power has sent this response to the Department of Industry in regards to the ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper. Ultimately, Dr Simon was forced to write “ERM Power has considered…
On behalf of Origin Energy, Steve Reid – Manager of Wholesale Regulatory Policy; has submitted a response to the Department of Industry regarding the ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper. In his letter, he stated “If…
Be the first to commenton "Major Energy Users Inc. comments on ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper"
Be the first to comment on "Major Energy Users Inc. comments on ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper"