Simon Camroux – Manager of Wholesale Markets Regulation at AGL, has submitted an open letter to the Department of Industry responding to the recent Demand Response Mechanism (DRM) Consultation Paper. The letter goes on to state “It is clear to AGL that there is currently no market failure that has been identified that would actually merit the implementation of the DRM. Electricity consumers, both large and small, are readily able to hedge their exposure to flucutations in market prices (from – $1000MWh to $13,500MWh) with a number of electricity retailers, improve consumption efficiency or invest in supply substitutes i.e. solar PV. Additionally, the availability of hedge products to manage market exposure is only increased when there is a significant supply overhang – as currently exists in the NEM.”
The original report compiled by Oakley Greenwood can be found here.
David Headberry, representative for the Major Energy Users (MEU), has written an open letter to the Department of Industry commenting on Oakley Greenwood’s Demand Response Mechanism (DRM) cost benefit analysis. The Major Energy Users Inc. is made up of more…
Neil Anderson, on behalf of Energex Limited, has penned this open letter to the Department of Industry. Mr Anderson stated “Energex continues to support efficient demand side participation as part of our approach to operating an efficient network, improving asset…
Dr Fiona Simon from ERM Power has sent this response to the Department of Industry in regards to the ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper. Ultimately, Dr Simon was forced to write “ERM Power has considered…
Given our keen interest* in all forms of Demand Response operating within the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM), it was with interest that we noted this media release from AGL Energy a couple weeks ago about their trial of how…
Be the first to commenton "AGL responds to the ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper"
Be the first to comment on "AGL responds to the ‘cost benefit assessment of the demand response mechanism’ consultation paper"