This afternoon we posted this article on WattClarity, exploring how the proposed new buy-back mechanism (one potential form of Demand Response in the NEM) might impact on the way in which prices are set for the NEM.
Related Articles
Dan Lee
Wednesday, October 8 2014
When the Levee Breaks
On Wednesday the founder and CEO of Altus Energy Strategies, Michael Williams published an article on WattClarity which outlined what topics need to be considered when businesses develop an energy strategy. Amongst the options discussed are methods of demand response…
Dan Lee
Wednesday, June 29 2016
Manufacturers in Tasmania paid to reduce production
The state-owned Hydro Tasmania have agreed to give industrial energy users compensation for reducing production during Tasmania’s ongoing energy crisis. The Australian newspaper has published some updated numbers on the the deals estimating that the energy users are being paid…
Paul McArdle
Thursday, January 3 2019
Some highlights on our Demand Response journey (to 31 Dec 2018)
The AEMC is currently considering 3 separate, but related, rule change proposals relating to a particular form of demand response in the NEM as noted here. Given our experience in supporting the growth of different forms of demand response in…
Dan Lee
Thursday, March 10 2016
An unwanted form of Demand Response
Earlier today Paul McArdle from WattClarity published this article which commented on Tasmania’s unfolding energy crisis. Paul mentions that some of the biggest energy users in the state are helping to conserve precious water supplies by agreeing to some substantial reductions…
Be the first to comment on "How prices will be set, under the proposed new “Demand Response Mechanism”"